Hi Craig,

I would like to collaborate on Squeak 3.10 too but I need to know the
direction we want to go too. I hope that my vision of the next Squeak
development is clear - maximal modularization based on small kernel,
minimal morphic system, loadable eToys, test&build server.
I would like to know the view of the board on my work and if it is too
much radical or we will adopt it as the next official stream.

-- Pavel

On 11/22/06, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Bryce--
>
> > Would it be possible to post the list of volunteers to the list with
> > their proposals for the next release? Or better for the volunteers to
> > post their proposals here? It would be great to know [the direction in
> > which people would like to take Squeak]. A little public discussion
> > and visibility would be great.
>
>     Squeak-dev has always been an open forum for that (far beyond a
> little :). Volunteers should feel free, as always, to discuss what
> they'd like to do for Squeak.
>
> > Keep up the good work.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>
> -C
>
> --
> Craig Latta
> http://netjam.org/resume
>
>
>
>