release team discussion (was "2006-11-15 SqF board notes")
azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 23 16:33:24 UTC 2006
If etoys and everything will really be loadable at the end, then this sounds
very good to me.
>From: "Pavel Krivanek" <squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: release team discussion (was "2006-11-15 SqF board notes")
>Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:04:20 +0100
>I would like to collaborate on Squeak 3.10 too but I need to know the
>direction we want to go too. I hope that my vision of the next Squeak
>development is clear - maximal modularization based on small kernel,
>minimal morphic system, loadable eToys, test&build server.
>I would like to know the view of the board on my work and if it is too
>much radical or we will adopt it as the next official stream.
>On 11/22/06, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:
>> > Would it be possible to post the list of volunteers to the list with
>> > their proposals for the next release? Or better for the volunteers to
>> > post their proposals here? It would be great to know [the direction in
>> > which people would like to take Squeak]. A little public discussion
>> > and visibility would be great.
>> Squeak-dev has always been an open forum for that (far beyond a
>>little :). Volunteers should feel free, as always, to discuss what
>>they'd like to do for Squeak.
>> > Keep up the good work.
Talk now to your Hotmail contacts with Windows Live Messenger.
More information about the Squeak-dev