Squeak and Namespaces

Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Thu Nov 30 15:43:48 UTC 2006

Hi G"oran,

on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:04:00 +0100, you wrote:
> When in fact we IMHO probably have these choices:
> 3. Wait forever for "stronger cool advanced" solutions that will be
> presented, shot down and never enter the official Squeak. And during this
> perpetual wait we will still be using crappy prefixes, while arguing to
> death on squeak-dev about different models more incomprehensive than the
> next.
> Wanna bet? :)

You have at least 1.99 supporters, already (counting you full ;-). And  
there came other +1's.

My concern is just 1 (in words: one) message send in distance away from  
your implementation, even if sombody'd replace #>~ by #:: :)


> regards, Göran

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list