Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
> I think that the below must be considered for inclusion into 4.0.

I think first we need a working implementation again, then we need to do 
some measures about speed and space and then we can start thinking about 
adoption. It's a long way to adopt such fundamental changes.

Cheers,
   - Andreas


> 
> /Klaus
> 
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:22:38 +0200, tim Rowledge wrote:
>> On 3-Oct-06, at 3:02 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
>>> Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>> Well, in that case all I can say is: "Code speaks" ;-) If you still 
>>>> have
>>>> that code from '98 and can update it to work with method properties I'd
>>>> like to see it and I'd like us to have the discussion about which
>>>> approach people like more.
>>>
>>> I'd very much like to see the code from 98 as it stands, without any
>>> changes, to get some feel for the scale of the change as proposed.
>>
>> See
>>
>> http://www.rowledge.org/tim/squeak/SqFiles/packages/NewCompiledMethod-Archive.zip 
>>
>>
>> for the original released files. The new CM class is very simple and 
>> it is the cloner changes that were the really tricky part - the 
>> earlier cloner was very limited and need quite a bit of sneaky work to 
>> make it possible to do the needed transmutations.
>>
>> Note that this bunch of files don't have anything much by way of 
>> clever tricks for handling source; I can't find anything on my system 
>> from the experiements I did at Interval.
>> Also note that the chances of being able to filein this code to any 
>> recent image is essentially zero. Don't waste your time!
>>
>> tim
>> -- 
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> Useful Latin Phrases:- Gramen artificiosum odi = I hate Astroturf.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
>