Cryptographic Primitives
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Fri Oct 6 21:13:30 UTC 2006
J J wrote:
>> No. First, Exupery is not a JIT.
>
> I had been told it was. In this list actually.
Yeah, it's quite confusing actually. I found the statement that
"[Exupery is] a "JIT" for Squeak that doesn't compile just in time"
which (to me) makes no sense as "JIT" stands for "just in time" so how
could a JIT not compile just in time? ;-)
Cheers,
- Andreas
>> Second, it is not yet in a state where it can be used for serious
>> production projects.
>
> Right. Which is why I said "Speeding up now is good".
>
>> Third, having a plugin doesn't mean you can't have a pure smalltalk
>> version - in fact the pure smalltalk version would be the default
>> isn't available. Therefore, adding the primitives doesn't take
>> anything away, all it does is add some very significant speed benefits.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Andreas
>
> Well it sounds like a big win then.
>
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|