Isn't the list that Stef is starting the same list you propose be 
produced after the first two months?

Don't get me wrong, a plan is a good thing to have I'm just trying to 
understand how you wont end up with a big list that will give you the 
shivers... :o)

Z.

Andreas Raab wrote:
> I don't know what other people think, but these long feature lists just 
> give me the shivers. What if instead of listing feature X, Y, and Z (on 
> many of which the implementation hasn't even started) we simply have a 
> schedule that says:
> 
> a) Open discussion: Two months of determining what's ready to go into 
> the next release. At the end of the that period there should be a list 
> of things that we'd like to have in the next release.