"slices" of packages (was: A process proposal for 3.10)

Hernan Tylim htylim at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 15:28:44 UTC 2006


For what its worth, I very much like the package universe approach for its
conceptual simplicity.

Regards,
Hernán


On 17 Oct 2006 10:49:11 -0400, Lex Spoon <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
>
> "Pavel Krivanek" <squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz> writes:
> > Very good notes. This problems are described in the thread with Stef's
> > postmortem analysis
> > (
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-October/109807.html
> )
>
>
> It is just painful reading Stephane's description of package slices.
>
> Why not use Package Universes to organize a collection of package
> versions?  There would be a 3.10 release universe.  The release team
> would know the update password, and they could update that universe
> with new package versions as they see fit.
>
> Just give me the word, and I'd be happy to set up a server for you to
> experiment with.
>
>
> -Lex
>
>
>
>


-- 
Saludos,
Hernán
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20061017/47073ad8/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list