On 24.10.2006, at 22:27, Lex Spoon wrote:

> Marcus Denker <denker at iam.unibe.ch> writes:
>> I added this improved SharedQueue as SharedQueue2 to 3.9 very early:
>>
>> | MarcusDenker  10-07-05 18:09  in 3.9 for further testing
>>
>> Sadly, nobody tested it.
>
> Right.  As a result of this process, Squeak ends up using the
> known-broken code instead of the tested, believed-fixed code.
>

If it was tested, why not communicate it?

> Strange, no?  Everyone involved does good work, and we end up in a
> situation like this.
>

Actually, there was a last "ok, this works" missing. If it was so  
important,
why didn't you add a comment to mantis or send a mail? Fixes and  
especially
anhancements need to be actively supported, especially by their  
creators.

In this case it was *only* missing this last "please add this, I  
tested it in 3.9a, it works".

        Marcus