Hi Göran,

on Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:49:09 +0200, you wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ok, let's back up a bit. If I got it right it is all about deciding on
> one of these three ways forward:
...
>
> 3. Make eToys reloadable (and throw it out), of course, this is the
> "best" route. But who will do it? And if noone steps up to do it, is it
> okay to pick #2 above instead of #1?
...
> PS. If I am not mistaken Pavel's code does not make eToys reloadable
> with Morphic still being in the image, right? I presume Morphic and
> eToys are intertwined. If I am wrong, then hey - that means #3 is
> already done and we can all just go for it.

Well, *this* part of the debate made me "tout" the "conspiracy" question  
in this thread :|

Did you read Pavel's response to this thread. What he says there is, by  
the time of this writing, (computer-) ages long known to the community:  
removable and reloadable Etoys, etc, IN THE ACTUAL 3.9 IMAGE (excuse me  
for the emphasis).

So, how come you still question it? What is it that I don't understand,  
what exactly are the unknown requirements (and who does require)?

/Klaus