I am standing by Juan's proposal, do you? (was Re: Removing Etoys, Morphic and other friends)

Stéphane Rollandin lecteur at zogotounga.net
Tue Oct 31 19:07:57 UTC 2006


>> To be honest I never had been an etoys user and probably should not 
>> jump in here. But anyway I wonder: if etoys are already working just 
>> fine right now (in efficiently forked image) why do they can not be 
>> detangled from the current squeak-dev image to allow it move forward?
>>
> 
> I don't know, I did not implement eToys. I just use it, happily.
> 

sorry, I think I missed your point. you meant "if eToys work currently 
well in Squeakland, why not get rid of them in Squeak-dev" ?. in that 
case my answer is quite simple: I work in Squeak-dev, not Squeakland.

Stef



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list