On 2 sept. 06, at 03:06, Andreas Raab wrote:

> Mathieu wrote:
>>> Probably because whoever wrote this was blessfully unaware that this
>>> message is never sent but inlined by the compiler.
>> I think this is more beacause the right behavior is this. As Ken  
>> Causey said (old) compiler do it wrong.
>
> No, the compiler got it exactly right. It was faithfully optimizing  
> the chosen definition of #ifNotNil: - whoever changed the  
> definition "got it wrong" since the definition should not be  
> changed without also changing the optimization in the compiler.
>
> But what's *really* annoying to me is that this change went unnoticed.

Indeed I think that we should invest in tests and a testserver

Stef