On Sep 7, 2006, at 5:13 AM, Ramon Leon wrote:

>> I'm fine excepting your definition of DSL. However, I still
>> think there should be a way to describe the more specific,
>> interpreted case. There's a lot of value in looking at the
>> interpreted case as a separate technique. And that's hard to
>> do if you say DSL and everyone just makes their own assumptions.
>>
>> -Rich-
>
> What's wrong with simply saying interpreted DSL?
>
>

Nothing, except we pretty much invented the term here. And no one  
else is using it.

It's not really a problem I expect us to solve. I just wanted to  
explore the miscommunication, so I could understand it better.