Well, since Keymapping is also used by Romain's services (I think, but
probably we should ask him), and services are already part of the image, I
would add Keymapping and not Keybinder. Once keymapping is in place one
could re-write the window switcher to use a keybinding from keymapping. All
the other features of KeyBinder are already present in keymapping.

For 3.10 I would vote to add the required modifications to the squeak's
event mechanism in the squeak core so further packages could be developed
without relying on custom modifications to the event's core.

Regards,
Hernán

On 9/14/06, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou at laposte.net> wrote:
>
> Hernan Tylim a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> > I saw on the web page that KeyBinder might be part of the image so I
> > just wanted to warn that KeyBinder does a very subtle hack, but a hack
> > nevertheless, to the key event mechanism in order to trap the
> key-bindings.
> >
> > This warning is because if someone would want to install another
> > keybinding mechanism , like keymapping I guess, it might mest something
> > up, but don't know for sure, didn't test it.
>
> So, what should I do ? KeyBinder is very cool for switching between
> windows and other things like this. Does one of you have an opinion ?
>
> Thank you for pointing this
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
>
>
>


-- 
Saludos,
Hernán
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060914/763ab3cc/attachment.htm