Request for links (was: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project)
J J
azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 25 03:53:16 UTC 2006
At this point, I would say everything you know about. I mean, the stuff on
squeak.org and whysmalltalk.com I have tracked down, but I am sure you have
spots you go to that I am not aware of.
If the information is too much we can take a time out and go through and
classify it. But we will need all levels of documentation before we are
finished.
>From: "Ralph Johnson" <johnson at cs.uiuc.edu>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: Request for links (was: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project)
>Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:46:10 -0500
>
>>One of the deliverables from the Documentation project is a comprehensive
>>index of available documentation. So if everyone who knows of some
>>not-so-well-known documentation please send it. If you don't want to put
>>it
>>on the list you can send it to Mathew and myself.
>
>What do you mean by "documentation"? One reason that documentation is
>a problem is that so much has been written, but some of it is
>advanced, some of it is for Smalltalk in general, which might or might
>not be applicable, some of it is old and no longer 100% correct, some
>of it is written in mailing lists rather than as formal documents. Do
>you want lecture notes, documentation for particular packages, videos?
>
>My guess is that the best way to find what is relevant is to do what
>you are doing, i.e. to ask questions and to see which documents you
>are given for answers.
>
>-Ralph
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|