Philippe,

I think that you work too much with marcus :)
Been right does not mean to be bitter or negativist :)
We can change that. Step by step.
We did a lot in 3.9 and if people help/want we can do a lot in 3.10 too.

send fixes and we will consider them

Stef

>> > So Squeak is not meant to build commercial products (Impara,
>> > Smallthought, ... )?
>> >
>> > To be honest I have a hard time renumbering the last time
>> > SqueakMap worked and did not throw an obscure error at me.
>> >
>> > That's why I prefer to have all my packages in Monticello,
>> > just hit load and it works.
>> >
>> > Philippe
>>
>> Seaside is changing that, Squeak is perfect for writing commercial  
>> web
>> applications.
>
> Not perfect. Not even close. Just look at the hacks introduced in
> Seaside2.7a1-avi.10 because blocks in Squeak suck.
>
> Do you know how many times I got bitten (doing commercial web
> applications) because I forgot to add a #fixTemps? It can tell you one
> thing, if Java 1.7 will get closures, it will not require #fixTemps.
>
> Then there are all these VM horror stories. And don't get me started
> on persistence, or XML, or SOAP, or concurrency, or ...  or IO in
> general, urls, ... or browsers
>
> Philippe
>