Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
> Do we need to cool down the whole squeak community engine and relax a bit?

Not really much to cool down over facts, is there? ;-) I'm merely 
correcting the obvious mistake of claiming that "we always said that". 
Provenly incorrect, indeed the claim to the opposite was a *major* 
argument for including a number of (otherwise hardly to justify) 
packages. Just like Marcus says in that message.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

> 
> Andreas Raab a écrit :
>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> This image is not a public one for non-dev.
>>> This is not the equivalent of Squeak3.8 welcome with the Squeak slow 
>>> logo.
>>> This image is the basic image on top of which people can build the 
>>> other image. We always said that.
>>
>>
>> Actually, Marcus (which I believe is included in the "we" above) said 
>> -in response to my request of removing the FFI- the precise opposite:
>>
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-August/106718.html 
>>
>>
>> <quote>
>>   But honestly don't regard this is a "basic" image... it has lots and
>>   lots of stuff in it that is not needed, FFI is just one of these.
>>   We will not do a "full" image this time (people can just install the
>>   packages they want, and a 'full' image would have needed
>>   to be done and tested months ago).
>>
>>   So just consider it to be the new "full" image...
>> </quote>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   - Andreas
>>
> 
> 
>