Keith, did you miss my questions? :)

On 8/4/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/07, Keith Hodges <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > I added Split-Join as a package in the development universe.
> >
> > This is a small set of functionality, much discussed on the list, which
> > has not yet gained the notoriety required to make it into 3.10. Making
> > this an item that can be named as a dependant, should other packages
> > make use of it this has the benefit of recording its usefulness. It also
> > means that I/you can write packages so that we can be sure it is loaded
> > when needed.
>
>
>
> Cool.  This is the double dispatch way that lets you do things like:
> #(252 211 203) joinWith: #(255 254) => #(252 255 254 211 255 254 203)
> right?
>
>
> I proposed enabling Universes to run arbitrary, or Installer based
> > scripts, but this is considered somewhat cavalier. So undaunted, and no
> > less barbaric I have used a PackageInfo-#preamble to load this script!
> > This has the disadvantage of being hard to maintain and it is working
> > invisible magic behind the scenes , whereas the script option would have
> > been visible and manageable.
>
>
>
> Why?  Why is a script needed to add the methods from your class?
>
>
> In spite of this I think that Monticello1.5 is nearly ready to be used
> > in 3.10. I tried using the old one for a few hours and got very
> > frustrated with loosing class extensions.
> >
> > enjoy
> >
> > Keith
>
>
>
> Losing class extensions?  You mean star methods?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070807/bb799bc6/attachment.htm