Hi Craig,

You are right; I didn't have the text in front of me and remembered only
the part. Although I still think that Squeak was the main point, I stand
corrected and understand the feelings expressed in the reactions.

Ivan

-----Original Message-----
From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of
Craig Latta
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:15 PM
To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Subject: re: that zany blogosphere thing


Hi Ivan--

> Correct me if I am wrong, but the original was not about the people
> who were developing Squeak. It was about Squeak as such, not the good
> or bad will of the people who selflessly work on it.

     Actually, I think the comment that "the maintainer of the main VM
code publically stated he will do shit unless someone pays him" is
pretty clearly a personal attack.


-C

--
Craig Latta
improvisational musical informaticist
www.netjam.org
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]