Squeak-dev is not a fork

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Aug 15 12:08:17 UTC 2007


Since its not a fork, and obviously not a spoon, and not mainstream,
then what short term can be used to identify it?

Joking..  :)

On 15/08/07, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/8/15, Göran Krampe <goran at krampe.se>:
> > > I've heard many times that squeak-dev is yet another fork of Squeak.
> > > It's NOT the case from my point of view because:
> > >
> > > - squeak-dev is built on top of the last squeak release and beta versions
> > > - there is not a single patch applied in squeak-dev
> > > - it's only an aggregation of already existing packages that anyone
> > > can load in his base image
> >
> > I actually meant squeak.org when I wrote Squeak-dev. I was referring to
> > the image maintained by the developers typically hanging on the squeak-dev
> > mailinglist - and not your image which is called Squeak-Dev.  Sorry for
> > the bad choice of words. :)
> >
> > So I haven't viewed your image as a fork, at least not yet. ;)
>
> Ok :-). But I heard it already that's why I wrote this mail. I hope
> things are clearer now.
>
> --
> Damien Cassou
>
>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list