"Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou at gmail.com> writes:
> I've heard many times that squeak-dev is yet another fork of Squeak.
> It's NOT the case from my point of view because:
> 
> - squeak-dev is built on top of the last squeak release and beta versions
> - there is not a single patch applied in squeak-dev
> - it's only an aggregation of already existing packages that anyone
> can load in his base image

I did not realize you felt this way, but it is nice to hear.  How do
you square this view, though, with your recent inclusion of the
Monticello 1.5 patches?  These patches change the core image so much
that their author says the word "patch" is not an adequate word to
describe them.

I would think that, for a developer's universe compatible with 3.10,
we need to also use the standard version of Monticello, whatever that
version may end up being.


Lex