"Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou at gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think including Monticello1.5 in future squeak-dev releases
> can be seen as a patch to Squeak. This is because, for me, Monticello
> is just a package. If an enhanced version, maintained by someone
> interested, is available, I would like people to start using it to
> discover bugs. However, Monticello1.5 currently has a bug which
> prevents me from releasing a new squeak-dev based on it.

That's all fine, but you are still describing non-standard patches to
the core image.  Many people would call that a fork.

In my opinion, it would best to coordinate with the release team
on this, at least as a place to start.


Lex