On 8/25/07, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> As observation..
>
> This discussion is a good example of purists who trowing away any new
> ideas just because they 'don't follow standard' or 'can be done with
> current syntax'.

I certainly hope you didn't mean me by this observation. :)  I have no
problem with a "forced evaluation" operator.  My issue is stating in a
load voice that the cascade operator is useless and we should ditch it
in favor of the new schematics.