Time seconds in 3.10

Keith Hodges keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Dec 8 22:33:11 UTC 2007


Andreas Raab wrote:
> Keith Hodges wrote:
>> Andreas Raab wrote:
>>> The difference appears to be in Time>>now which for some inexplicable
>>> reason now includes a milliseconds value. Albeit incorrectly I might
>>> add since the msecs clock is not actually synchronized with the
>>> seconds clock. Looks like a regression to me.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   - Andreas
>> It is "actually" synchronised.
>
> Oh, I see. You're keeping an offset manually. I was referring to
> primMsecsClock which has no relation (at least on Windows) to the
> value obtained by primTotalSeconds. Do you know if this adjustment
> will survive standby/suspend and power cycling?
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
Hi, Andreas,

I agree with you it is difficult to know whether this scheme is robust
with regard to the scenarios mentioned. does the image/vm get informed
when it is resumed?

Keith




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list