Is SqueakSource as Monticello repository limited to open-source projects?

Lukas Renggli renggli at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 10:07:46 UTC 2007


> The main app I will work on is commercial. Is it still OK to use
> SqueakSource as my Monticello repository (there will be more than one of
> us)? Who pays for it (or, how do I pay for is :-)? And how secure is it?

We do not care what you use SqueakSource for (as long it is legal).
Some projects are closed and probably used for commerical software, I
don't know.

All the other information you can find on the front-page:

"This service is brought to you for free: it is backed up daily.
Still, please make sure that you have your own proper backups and note
that we cannot give any accessibility guarantees. However, if you wish
you can set up your own SqueakSource server."

One of the nice properties of Monticello is that all touched versions
are cached on the developer machines as well. So you don't rely on the
availability of the squeaksource.com service.

"We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Software Composition
Group and the University of Bern for hosting this service."

It is running on one of our machines in Bern, Switzerland. Most
commercial projects I know have setup their own SqueakSource servers,
but this is not exactly trivial to do.

Cheers,
Lukas

-- 
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list