Making Squeak more accessible and used - reversing the trend
Klaus D. Witzel
klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Tue Feb 6 15:25:12 UTC 2007
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:08:54 +0100, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
> Brad Fuller wrote:
>> Thus, it
>> arises that on every opportunity for attacking the reformer, his
>> opponents do so with the zeal of partisans, the others only defend him
>> half-heartedly, so that between them he runs great danger."
>> 1513 AD Machiavelli
>
> this is very true of any truggle for power, like in politics, economy,
> and war.
>
> but I fail to see any need for such struggle in computer science. Squeak
> is an open source project and as such does not have to fight anything.
> if we just make it as good as we can, according to our own elitist and
> knowledgeable idea of "good", then that is enough.
+ (1 big)
> I do not see the point in having anyone to convince, nor any fight to
> figh, nor any product to sell. let's just be free of struggle,
> intelligent and creative. let's just build a beautiful piece of
> software, end even if it takes 50 years for its quality to be somewhat
> largely recognized (as it happens to Lisp nowadays), well what is the
> problem ?
Yeah, there are so many open source projects, see for example yesterday's
"How To Tell Open-Source Winners From Losers"
- http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/05/1618253
but only so few programming languages ;-)
/Klaus
> Stef
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|