On 19-Feb-07, at 10:32 AM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:

>
> Craig suggests that we do not post an article that has candidates  
> answer my
> questions because my questions are loaded.

I pretty much agree with Craig here; no bad intent is needed by  
anyone in the process and yet it can very easily become a nasty  
argument.  It seems to be the nature of email/group communications.  
Survey questions (and what Ron was suggesting is essentially a  
survey) are very difficult to write in such a way as to *elicit  
opinions* rather than *agreement with implied opinion in the question*.

1) Have you stopped beating your spouse yet?
2) Do you agree that we must always fight against stopping <foo>  
being prevented, if indeed it not happening caused nothing to not be  
undoably redone?
3) Why? Explain in 750 words, double spaced on unlined paper. In  
green crayon.


tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Klingon Code Warrior:- 7) "You question the worthiness of my Code?! I  
should kill you where you stand!"