>From: "Michael van der Gulik" <mikevdg at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Exporting Namespaces
>Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:03:58 +1300
>
>- Namespace source code, rather than being stored in squeak.sources, could
>be stored in a hierarchy of directories under individual files for each
>class, with version history stored in or alongside those files.
>
>Advantages: You can use Subversion / CVS with this approach, or in the 
>worst
>case, use a text editor.
>Disadvantages: ...

Subversion and especially CVS suck badly.  darcs is much simpler and easy to 
use.  But even better would be to integrate some of the ideas of darcs 
(theory of patches) directly into Squeak for easier manipulation of changes 
within the image.

_________________________________________________________________
Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE.  
  http://zone.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmtagline