election details *PLEASE READ*
Todd Blanchard
tblanchard at mac.com
Wed Feb 21 08:55:13 UTC 2007
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> I must admit I'm not particularly impressed with that overall
> assessment.
Then don't vote for me. Sheesh.
Given that AFAICS you've spent the better part of your career hacking
Smalltalk rather than working in the mudpits, I'm not giving your
view from a distance a lot of weight.
I have years of full time development in these languages - C++
expert, Java expert, Objective C expert. Smalltalk - I'm just pretty
good.
Namespaces I've seen the effect of in C++, Java and VW. I think they
are a bigger PITA than they are worth. Honestly, I prefer sticking
two letter prefixes in front of stuff.
Modules are so overloaded you'll have to define what you mean.
Interfaces - not a fan of the hardwired interface ala Java. I do
like informal protocols as implemented in ObjectiveC. Specifically,
I like that I can define a protocol, and then ask an object if it
conforms to the protocol without having to go back and say "this
object will implement this protocol". Not that explicit protocols
isn't occasionally useful, but I think the current
subclassResponsibility mechanism gets the same point across.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|