Keith Hodges wrote:
> I would like to know if anyone actually uses the #expectedFailure 
> mechanism in SUnit as is?

We have used it in Croquet to point out known differences between platforms.

> TestResult appears to me to be needlessly complicated by the whole 
> concept of expected this and unexpected thats.

As a user (and not an implementor) the complexity doesn't disturb me one 
bit. If it can be tidied up it's certainly great but if that means 
breaking the test framework I'm not to fond of the idea.

> If there is an alternative way of categorising and running expected 
> failures, would anyone object if TestResult were simplified somewhat?

If the only benefit is a simpler implementation I fail to see the value 
of the change for the people whose code this breaks. How about making it 
simpler and keeping it compatible instead?

Cheers,
   - Andreas