>>
> Welcome :-) I'll try to add you to the password lists etc. (I'm not  
> sure I remember how to do that...)
> Squeak.org and the swiki are different because people wanted a  
> small, easy intro to the Squeakworld.
>
> As you know the swiki is neither :-) I think it is a nice distinction.
> The documentation pages need a lot of attention, so  you are  
> welcome to work on them.
> I don't think we should move all content over to Squeak.org from  
> the swiki as most users don't have access to squeak.org editing and  
> therefore editing will be a major obstacle.
>
> The distinction between the doc team and web team would be that  
> there were some talk about linking the doc into the image somehow.  
> But I agree, we have much of the same purpose, documenting Squeak.
>
> I'm not sure how well Pier would scale as a wiki. It is quite  
> different than both Smallwiki and Swiki and it I haven't gotten  
> used to it yet. Smallwiki is also quite different from Swiki.
>
> I'm not sure how to give you a squeak.org image as it contains  
> passwords etc. so I can't post it publicly. Access to the server is
> provided by the Box admins.
>
> Hope we will have a good time working together.
>
> Karl

ESUG proposed to lukas to get payed to produce a better version of  
Pier that ESUG (and everybody) could use to
build website. Now lukas is totally fully booked. We wanted to have a  
file/database back end with external resources management, an admin,  
and easy install download. We hope that lukas will get some time for  
Pier. So at least you know that I was not saying that we should  
change the underlying
system. just swap two paragraphs.

Stef