I would say someone from the squeakfoundation could register squeak.org at
openusability.org, but I am not sure whether they are that keen on my
suggestion as you are Jason. I reckon if the seaside.st and squeak.org
websites had more of a great looking, web 2.0 presence (whatever that might
be) it could only be more beneficial for the smalltalk community. 


Jason Rogers-4 wrote:
> 
> I think this is a good idea... Anyone want to lead that?  G?
> 
> On 1/21/07, GeertC <geert.wl.claes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  "I want to be **proud** to put a link on http:/www.squeak.org" I skimmed
>> through this discussion and noticed a difference in opinion as to what
>> the
>> Squeak home page should look like and contain. The web site already looks
>> heaps better after Brad Fuller's work. I reckon it still lacks some
>> vavoom
>> though  Why don't we ask the people at openusability.org for their
>> expert
>> usability and design opinion and let the Squeak experts here focus on
>> Squeak
>> itself? g
>> ________________________________
>>  View this message in context: Re: Could we fix the web site
>>  Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jason Rogers
> 
> "Where there is no vision, the people perish..."
>     Proverbs 29:18
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Could-we-fix-the-web-site-tf2931405.html#a8671337
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.