> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> From: craig at netjam.org> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:36:30 -0700> Subject: re: Contributors Agreement signature status?> >      I'm mostly a technocrat: I want to put my effort into the> technology I think is most effective. Do you have a similar mindset? Is> there something about Spoon that you think is lacking? Are we dealing> with technical issues, or political ones, or something else? It's not> clear to me why, apparently, we're working at cross purposes.Just as an observer from the side, isn't it the case that Pavel is trying the make the smallest possible code base *with current Squeak* while you are making lots of modifications to how the environment itself works?  And if that's the case, would they still be cross purposes?  I would see it more as "low hanging fruit" (so to speak) vs. "the whole shabang", no?
_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!  
http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlmailtextlink
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070704/7d0f8c2c/attachment.htm