Asking again

Bert Freudenberg bert at freudenbergs.de
Tue Jul 10 20:40:13 UTC 2007


On Jul 10, 2007, at 21:55 , Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:

> El 7/10/07 3:28 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at freudenbergs.de>  
> escribió:
>
>>  And watching Edgar struggle all alone
>> with 3.10 you may even be right. Hence my question - what's the point
>> of having a release nobody wants? Why not make the release be as cool
>> and inviting and useful as possible?
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
> About all Hilaire said, I wandering if he like Pavel work and one  
> of 3.10
> goals , try to get closer to MinimalMorphic.
>
> You can't have a smaller image and all the dev tools, but one reliable
> release letting you go dev or go fun as my "FunSqueak3.10"


Well my personal opinion is that a release should come in several  
flavors, from a minimal image to a kitchen-sink one including etoys/ 
media tools as well as smalltalk dev tools. And, again in my opinion,  
only the latter deserves the label "Squeak", the smaller would be  
"Squeak-Core".

That would of course require having more than a single person working  
on it.

- Bert -





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list