Asking again
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Tue Jul 10 20:40:13 UTC 2007
On Jul 10, 2007, at 21:55 , Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> El 7/10/07 3:28 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at freudenbergs.de>
> escribió:
>
>> And watching Edgar struggle all alone
>> with 3.10 you may even be right. Hence my question - what's the point
>> of having a release nobody wants? Why not make the release be as cool
>> and inviting and useful as possible?
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
> About all Hilaire said, I wandering if he like Pavel work and one
> of 3.10
> goals , try to get closer to MinimalMorphic.
>
> You can't have a smaller image and all the dev tools, but one reliable
> release letting you go dev or go fun as my "FunSqueak3.10"
Well my personal opinion is that a release should come in several
flavors, from a minimal image to a kitchen-sink one including etoys/
media tools as well as smalltalk dev tools. And, again in my opinion,
only the latter deserves the label "Squeak", the smaller would be
"Squeak-Core".
That would of course require having more than a single person working
on it.
- Bert -
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|