yoshiki at squeakland.org
Tue Jun 12 22:19:36 UTC 2007
> Both Bert and Yoshiki are right, but to be more precise, this is the
> latin1 code page from dos (CP1252) see
> So macToSqueak and squeakToMac should rather be named macRomanToCP1252
> and cp1252toMacRoman...
Yes. That is more sensible.
> So yes, i vote like Michael, fix it!
> Otherwise, Squeak is not unicode internally for some of the characters
> from 128 to 255, and this contradict this basic assumptions made in this
> thread and by naive readers like me...
Otherwise? I'm not sure if this statement is true. I would phrase
it in this way: Squeak is Unicode internally, but some conversion that
happens at the image boundary have bugs. If you create a character
within the range of 160 to 255, you get the right/acceptable glyph for
More information about the Squeak-dev