[ANN] Nile 0.9.0

J J azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 21 19:30:38 UTC 2007

> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:18:53 -0700> From: andreas.raab at gmx.de> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] Nile 0.9.0> > Yes, I think given the benchmarks it's completely fair to say that Nile > is definitely on par with what we currently have. To be honest, > everything else would have come as a big surprise to me which is why I > looked at these benchmarks more carefully - the numbers you posted > seemed to indicate that there is a *major* speed advantage in the > microbenchmarks (>40%) and I was simply surprised to see such large numbers.I wouldn't expect much of a speed up either (unless the implementation before was really inefficient), and I didn't think that was the point.  I thought the point was simply to clean up collections by using traits.  I would just expect it to make the number of lines of code to maintain be less (and hopefully get rid of any #shouldNotImplement messages).
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! Check out the New MSN Mobile! 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20070621/bd68f731/attachment.htm

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list