[ANN][Squeak-dev Beta Image] Version 123
Ken G. Brown
kbrown at mac.com
Thu Jun 28 22:04:44 UTC 2007
Actually in thinking about it a bit further, I wouldn't mind seeing something like:
or really, what good does Beta even serve?
or even shorter for example if that's what is wanted:
>Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:41:25 +0200
>From: "Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [ANN][Squeak-dev Beta Image] Version 123
>To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"
> <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> <6ac749c10706272241m29e12067h1c6f57721921005a at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>2007/6/28, Ken G. Brown <kbrown at mac.com>:
>> I'm a bit confused with all the different versions of everything.
>> Might there be a more consistent methodology of versioning?
>> On June 18th, you mentioned changing your versioning scheme.
>> Might I ask which version of 123 is this? As far as I know there already was a dev version 123.
>St©phane answered to an old mail that's why the title is 123. My two
>last images are named squeak-dev-07.6 and squeak-dev-beta-07.6. Beta
>images have always been based on 3.10 whereas non beta are based on
>> Could the dev image include the 3.9 or 3.10 along with the update level in the versioning?
>Isn't the "beta" in the name enough?
More information about the Squeak-dev