SmalltalkImage current

Edgar J. De Cleene edgardec2001 at
Sat Jun 30 10:32:11 UTC 2007

El 6/30/07 3:31 AM, "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at> escribió:

> So I decided that since most of the methods in SmalltalkImage are of
> that kind it'd be more useful to move them back to where they belong and
> have SmalltalkImage instead of Smalltalk be the facade. It also means
> that one may be able to get rid of SmalltalkImage at some point (I'm
> pretty sure Smalltalk is around to stay ;-)
> Cheers,
>    - Andreas


I always like this view.
Ralph , I wish we could do the "revert to 3.4" for Smalltalk.
What is your point in this issue ?


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list