I mean writing tests verifying the behavior I choosed :-)

2007/3/6, J J <azreal1977 at hotmail.com>:
>
> You don't mean writing tests that are red on purpose I hope. :)
>
> >From: "Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou at gmail.com>
> >Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
> >list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> >To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers
> >list"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> >Subject: Re: PositionnableStream>>peekFor: not standard
> >Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:12:52 +0100
> >
> >As usually, we all have different opinions :-)
> >
> >Since most Smalltalks have the same #peekFor: implementation, I won't
> >touch it. However, I will explicitely explain the problem in the
> >comment and write tests.
> >
> >If some of you want, I can create a new method with the standard
> >implementation. You just need to give me a name. I will write tests
> >and a comment.
> >
> >--
> >Damien Cassou
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE.
>   http://zone.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmtagline
>
>
>


-- 
Damien Cassou