Indeed I could be taken for an idiot, unstable, or whatever. But on  
the other hand, my freedom is not to buy and I do not
want to give credit to something that does not match my expectations.  
So of course, I would lose my incredible credibility
but who cares, certainly not me.

Now a better answer would be that 1/2 or 2/3 of the board should be  
renewed every year. This way we make
sure that people with fresh energy can contribute. This is a point I  
will ask the new board to vote on.

I would prefer that if I drop the next person on the list get the  
position.

Stef

> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> Now as I said in the reply I wrote on the wiki election board,  
>> what is the process if as the 'guy never happy with life or xxx  
>> (fill as you prefer)' I decide that the board did not change  
>> enough and I want to redraw and let some new blood getting it.
>
> I would guess the process is to just continue on. That's one of the  
> advantages of having more than just one or two people on the board  
> and have annual elections - with seven, one or two (possibly three)  
> can drop out and the board can still successfully function for a  
> year. And if you do this a couple of years in the row, I'd expect  
> people to notice a pattern and eventually decide not to vote for  
> you anymore ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>