Reimplementing WeakKeyDictionary

Bert Freudenberg bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Mar 19 10:35:27 UTC 2007


On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:22 , Blake wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:53:21 -0800, Bert Freudenberg  
> <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 19, 2007, at 7:50 , Andreas Raab wrote:
>>
>>> Brief Q: You didn't explicitly specify what license those changes  
>>> are under. Would you be amendable to using MIT-style license for  
>>> it? (it would allow me to use the code trivially in Croquet)
>>
>> In case this hasn't been clear to everybody yet - we require MIT  
>> licensing for anything that people might want to go into official  
>> Squeak nowadays.
>
> A cursory Google suggests that "MIT licensing" might mean a number  
> of things. If it's this:
>
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
>
> Then it would seem that MIT licensing means you can do (or not do)  
> just about anything with the code, as long as the MIT license  
> accompanies whatever you do?

As I understand it, yes.

- Bert -





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list