Towards 3.9.1 What's going on here?

J J azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Tue May 8 15:12:29 UTC 2007


Why are you tied to monticello?  Lots of these things sound like they are 
part of the "core" anyway (which can't really be a montello package can it?)


>From: "Edgar J. De Cleene" <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: Towards 3.9.1 What's going on here?
>Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 18:47:00 -0300
>
>
>
>
>El 5/7/07 3:57 AM, "stephane ducasse" <stephane.ducasse at free.fr> escribió:
>
> > what are the problems you encounter?
>Image blows.
>I tell that many times. But some still don't know.
>
>And today I discover what Mantis 0006089: TTF Cache Speedup also blows the
>3.9 final
>
>Not the 3.10 , but I can't have how load a .mcz or .mcz with this .cs into
>image.
>
>Same for Klaus
>  0006336: Unicode membership test reduced to String #= (String
>#compare:caseSensitive:) ?
>
>
>Same for Martin Loewis
>0006348: [FIX] Improve performance of weak key dictionaries
>
>Last time what I said this.
>
>Monticello don't manage all cases.
>Old Cs style yes.
>
>Monticello have me working hours and having all kind of headaches.
>Old Cs style no.
>
>Wish we move ?
>What is more important , a better image or wait until some could do this
>"Monticello way" ?
>
>Edgar
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Now you can see trouble…before he arrives 
http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_protection_0507




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list