Great work Keith.  If the password thing gets fixed, then it sounds good.  
Team work is a good thing, but Monticello has had some of these problems for 
quite a while with nothing done about it (afaik).  At some point it's time 
to stop talking and start doing, with or without the team.  Good job taking 
that step, I hope dev-image adopts your Monticello (when it's safe at least 
:).

>From: Keith Hodges <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: [ANN] Monticllo Update
>Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:00:07 +0100
>
>Dear Edgar,
>
>I am sorry but you appear to have found what I think is called a minor bug, 
>the host string is not matching the persisted string for some reason. 
>Simple bugs like that can be fixed in a moment.
>
>This moment is nothing compared to the 70 or so hours I have invested in 
>the rest of the code.
>
>Merging code from 4 repositories, I may have missed a thing or two. 
>Especially when the code you are merging is modifying the tool that you are 
>using to perform the merge! Not to worry the working code is out there 
>somewhere. The PasswordManager is not my code, it comes from Andreas. As I 
>said it worked for me.
>
>Incidently, I forgot to include the atomic loading code in that last 
>release, and so have got my self into refactoring it and making it work 
>really well.
>
>Monticello is has some pretty cool code in it, I take my hat off to the 
>writers. I just think it is such a shame that it basically doesnt work as 
>it should. When you see it working as it should you realise what you have 
>been missing!
>
>If I am wrong then, and Monticello 1.5 ;-) doesnt cut the mustard, then the 
>joke is on me for a wasted week.
>If I am right then Monticello 2 will have some tough competition.
>
>Best regards
>
>Keith
>
>>Horrible.
>>Ask n times about password (That's why I remove of same in 3.10 building)
>>People don't should mess with crucial packages what have fine Squeakers as
>>owners.
>>If some wish play his own game, fine, for me Squeak is TEAM work.
>>
>>Edgar, Advocatus Diaboli again
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Like the way Microsoft Office Outlook works? You’ll love Windows Live 
Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_outlook_0507