On Thursday 17 May 2007 8:19 pm, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> 2007/5/17, subbukk <subbukk at gmail.com>:
> > On Thursday 17 May 2007 6:55 pm, Ralph Johnson wrote:
> > > The main reason why most project on SqueakSource don't have a decent
> > > project description is because most people are lazy.
> >
> > A rule isn't a rule unless it is enforced!
> >
> > How about rejecting project submissions unless they come with atleast 20
> > words in their description? Surely, creating a 20-word abstract shouldn't
> > be too much of a burden for someone who has put in so much effort into a
> > project.
>
> Which part of "we don't want to step on people's balls" wasn't clear?
The suggestion was in jest. I missed a smiley :-) :-)

Subbu