On 29-May-07, at 12:40 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:

> Yes, that is a very clever solution. You could tidy this up a  
> little by using:
Even better, yield is a very small, fast prim and so using it would  
have little chance of significantly affecting overall performance of  
such an algorithm. Much better than the rather longwinded version of  
yield that used to exist.


tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Useful random insult:- A gross ignoramus -- 144 times worse than an  
ordinary ignoramus.