Alternative Thread Schedulers
J J
azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Wed May 30 06:21:17 UTC 2007
From: tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Re: Alternative Thread Schedulers
>Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:48:07 -0700
>
>Not as such, no. *IF* you implement the io in such a way that it can be
>non-blocking (see the somewhat mouldy AsynchFile class for an example)
>then you would indeed make the relevant thread/Process yield by way of
>waiting on a semaphore.
Oh sorry, missed this part in my response. Actually, this is exactly what I
*don't* want. I don't want to jump through special hoops doing IO just to
play nice with scheduling, I want it to be that way by default like in the
OS. Sounds like I may have more work cut out for me then I thought. :)
_________________________________________________________________
Catch suspicious messages before you open themwith Windows Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_protection_0507
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|