More Delay/Semaphore "fun"
Paolo Bonzini
bonzini at gnu.org
Mon Oct 8 15:44:54 UTC 2007
Gary Chambers wrote:
> Possibly. Have you tested this?
Not on Monitor; Monitor>>#exit/#enter are used elsewhere, and as I said
the code is messy enough that you'd better be sure that Monitor-using
processes is never terminated.
> For the moment, to allow us to move on, we've switched to Semaphores and avaoided nesting.
You could instead use Mutex, since I now found out that
Mutex>>#critical: is basically the code I posted.
Paolo
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|