Ok, I merged them.  File is on the Mantis report.

On 10/20/07, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse at free.fr> wrote:
> chris
>
> could you merge your changes on RB formatter. I know that gutenberg
> could be used too.
> Damien what is the status of gutenberg?
> Because it would be cool to have a goo code formatter for squeak.
>
> Stef
>
> On 16 oct. 07, at 03:19, Chris Muller wrote:
>
> > True, unless the code was formatted with the RB Formatter in the
> > first place.
> >
> > I tweaked my image so that Alt+Shift+S RB formats and incorporated it
> > into my "save gesture".  Therefore, as more of my code becomes
> > formatted per the RB Formatter, the diffs are true.  I tweaked the RB
> > Formatter to format in Rectangular Block recommended by Kent Beck.
> >
> > What's even MORE inconvenient is the way, starting in the 3.9 image,
> > RB Formatter now strips (some) comments out of your code.  Not a very
> > good thing to do, given the seeming high-advocacy for commenting code
> > in this community; our own tools are working against us in this
> > matter!
> >
> > I fixed at least a couple of comment-stripping plague from the various
> > RbNodes but there is still at least one more.  :(
> >
> >
> > On 10/15/07, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2007/10/12, Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>:
> >>> 2007/10/11, Gwenaël Casaccio <mrgwen at gmail.com>:
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> For my master dissertation I'll work on the refactoring tools.
> >>>> Do you have
> >>>> any suggestions to improve the refactoring browser and to add
> >>>> better
> >>>> refactorings ?
> >>>
> >>> Kepp the formatting of methods.
> >>
> >> This behavior is really inconvenient. When you have a method and you
> >> operate a refactoring on it, the indentation and formatting is
> >> completely changed, making the diff unreadable.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Damien Cassou
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>