On 10/22/07, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, its maybe not a proper example, i just wanted to show, that we
> will need changes to codebase (not only VM) to better support of
> parallelism.

Well, personally I'm not trying to add transparent parallelism (Erlang
doesn't try this either).  I want inter-process communication to be
completely explicit, just easy.  I hadn't planned on adding anything
to the core libraries.  a parallelDo: wouldn't know where to send the
work anyway if you don't tell it.