is the interpreter running in 3.9/3.10?
because we should sit together and you should show me.

Stef
On 25 oct. 07, at 01:15, Mathieu Suen wrote:

> Hi rob
>
> You should post to the VM mailing list.
>
> Adrian  have post a patch for a 3.9 image
> Which image do you use?
>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since the simulator was broken for quite a while now, I thought  
>>> I'd give it a try to fix it (it would be a pitty if this nice  
>>> piece of work gets lost over time...). What I've got now works  
>>> pretty well, except for some UI issues, mainly concerning output  
>>> of text. For instance, most of the labels in the menus are not  
>>> visible (see screenshot below). But apart from that, it seems to  
>>> run just fine, and that's enough for what I need it.
>>>
>>> In case anybody is interested in the changes, let me know where I  
>>> should post them. There are VMM projects on squeaksource.com and  
>>> on source.squeakfoundation.org, but both seem unused.
>>> I started working from the VMM image of Ian from http:// 
>>> www.squeakvm.org/unix/release/ (version unix-3.9-10.*).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>> ___________________
>>> Adrian Lienhard
>>> www.adrian-lienhard.ch
>
>
>
> 	Mth
>
>
>
> On Oct 25, 2007, at 1:03 AM, Rob Withers wrote:
>
>> I am trying to run the InterpreterSimulatorLSB and I am getting an  
>> error.
>>
>> In #addNewMethodToCache, this line of code is called:
>>     self cCoerce: primitiveFunctionPointer to: 'long'
>>
>> where self is the IntepreterSimulatorLSB instance and  
>> primitiveFunctionPointer is #primitivePushFalse.  This results in  
>> ByteSymbol (#primitivePushFalse) does not understand  
>> #coerceTo:sim:.  It looks as if it is expecting an Integer or an  
>> Array as the value of primitiveFunctionPointer.  Can anyone shed  
>> some light here?
>>
>
>
>