Erlang a primitive language? (was Re: Multy-core CPUs)
Jason Johnson
jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 19:07:12 UTC 2007
And I prefer to see it at interface points. Not deep down in a
language where it's making everything inconvenient.
On 10/25/07, Peter William Lount <peter at smalltalk.org> wrote:
>
> Jason Johnson wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Matej Kosik <kosik at fiit.stuba.sk> wrote:
>
>
> I agree. Neither Erlang nor Smalltalk were designed with security in mind.
> Funny thing about
> security is, that if you do not get it right in the beginning, you cannot
> "add it later".
>
> The funny thing about security is that it is on the opposite end of a
> sliding scale, with "user friendly-ness" on the other side.
>
> As far as "you cannot add it later", given that nearly all the secure
> systems I can think off of the top of my head were indeed "added
> later" (e.g. HTTPS), I think this claim is false.
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with the point of view that it's better to add it before hand when
> it comes to certain topics like security.
>
> Cheers,
>
> peter
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|